As anyone who has managed a Search Ads campaign knows, while the results are largely fantastic, the limitations of the platform and the system as a whole feature major roadblocks to advertisers in investing more share of budget and share of mind into the platform.
While Search Ads are the single most valuable channel on a unit basis for many iOS marketers, Apple has only scratched the surface in terms of serving to advertisers the full potential of its Search Ads platform.
Since officially launching Search Ads in October 2016, Apple has made three significant improvements to the product, each of which comes with a caveat:
- De-duplication of entities added into the UI, such as keywords (which does not extend to bulk uploads) – which is somewhat difficult to classify as an improvement, as it is a common sense product requirement;
- Expansion to three additional English-speaking countries – although the platform still doesn’t support the Canadian market and ignores the rest of the world;
- Duplication support for ad groups, keywords, and negative keywords – however, campaigns cannot be copied and once more, this is a common sense product requirement.
Search Ads advertisers still cannot delete entities, report on post-install metrics in the UI, obtain total search volume by keyword, and are not provided with bid suggestions.
Meanwhile, Facebook has built an incredibly profitable platform to allow iOS app developers to advertise and acquire users, which is paying off in spades. Facebook earned over $8 billion from mobile revenues in its most recent quarter; with Facebook making over 50% of its revenue from mobile apps, that’s over $4 billion in ad quarterly revenue that Apple did not earn.
Google’s revenue from app install ads seems harder to quantify, yet Marketing Land points out that in September 2016, Google had driven 3 billion app install ads, up from 2 billion in May of 2016. So it’s safe to assume that Google is earning billions from store ads as well; and with UAC also available for iOS, Google is also profiting at Apple’s expense (and that doesn’t count the risk of re-allocation of budget from iOS to Android).
According to Apple’s quarterly earnings report, it made about $7 billion in the most recent quarter from services (which include Search Ads), which actually represents a decline vs the prior quarter, and an increase of only 17.5% vs the prior year.
1-100% of Apple’s ~$1 billion increase in YoY quarterly services revenue was due to Search Ads, leading to the conclusion that Apple, as one of the two major global mobile operating systems, is not eating its fair share of the app install ad revenue pie.
Moreover, according to TechCrunch, the mobile ad market was worth $20.86 billion in 2015 (and certainly has grown since). The article also references an extensive study by Mary Meeker, who, based on 2015 data, sees an opportunity to grow the mobile ad pie by an additional $22 billion.
With over 42 billion dollars available for Apple to use to offset its declining iPhone profits, an important question arises: why hasn’t Apple taken Search Ads more seriously?
On the off chance that Phil Schiller and team are listening to this (or this), there exists not only a laundry list of issues with the Search Ads platform that can be addressed, but several high-impact new opportunities to increase Apple’s Search Ads revenue and capture more budget from advertisers, while also operating within Apple’s standard for privacy:
- Apple can leverage the groundwork it has laid in indexing in-app purchases in the SERP by extending Search Ads to advertise in-app purchases;
- Apple can follow in Google UAC’s footsteps and insert a new ad unit into its featured section (e.g. Google’s “apps you may also like”), in the similar apps results that live in each app’s product page, or even a second ad unit located further down in the SERP;
- Apple can extend search ads into its spotlight search.
As an agency that manages Search Ads campaigns on behalf of a good number of clients, it’s in our and Apple’s best interest for Apple to improve its product, and to satiate advertisers’ desires to spend a much larger proportion of budget on Search Ads.
If Phil/team are reading this: we’re available to participate in a Search Ads product advisory group and await your call ☺